Value-Driven Contention in China: Forms, Tactics and State Responses

Author(s)

H. Christoph Steinhardt, Kai Yang

Abstract

This research challenges the conventional wisdom that value-driven protests in China are exceedingly rare and face harsh state repression. Drawing on a hand-coded, multi-source dataset of over 3,100 protests in three Chinese megacities from 2014 to 2016, we identify 67 protests that reveal a hitherto unknown underbelly of everyday, value-driven contention. Qualitatively, we identify three main forms of contentious performances. Quantitatively, we show how value-driven protesters combine non-disruptive tactics with ambitious targets and virtually never extract concessions. Surprisingly, we find that such protests are less often policed and repressed than other protests. They are also never met with violence from non-state actors. We provide three interpretations for the counter-intuitive finding on repression. This study shows that the Chinese state coexists with a non-negligible amount of explicitly regime-critical contention. It adopts a containment strategy, tolerating a certain extent of value-driven performances when the risk of spill-over into wider society is limited.

Organisation(s)

Department of East Asian Studies

External organisation(s)

Lingnan University

Journal

China Quarterly: an international journal for the study of China

Pages

1-18

ISSN

0305-7410

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741024001085

Publication date

01-2024

Peer reviewed

Yes

Austrian Fields of Science 2012

506014 Comparative politics, 506006 Peace studies, 504023 Political sociology, 602045 Sinology

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sociology and Political Science, Geography, Planning and Development, Development, Political Science and International Relations

Portal url

https://ucrisportal.univie.ac.at/en/publications/14645eaa-6c46-48cf-9d31-b4883ebdd630